Home African Development African Education Theories & Empirical Data
FundraiseScholarship Awards Links Contact Us Contact Us
  webmaster@africanidea.org    

IDEA Editorial

March 2, 2007

111th Anniversary of the Victory of Adwa


March 2, 2007 is the 111th anniversary of the victory of Adwa. This IDEA editorial, however, is not intended to present an elaborate version of the history of Adwa victory. It is rather a critique of the misguided perceptions and misconceptions with respect to Adwa. Some Ethiopians think that the victory of Adwa was the victory of the people of Adwa. This category of people is either misled by some mysterious and unfathomable dictates or is simply ignorant of the historical circumstances that led to the battle of Adwa.

The second category belong to the minority and secluded Ethiopians who found solace in Adwa by internalizing a figment of imagination that resonates a historical event that portrays Emperor Menelik as the sole victor. In its modified form, it is also sometimes stated that �Adwa is indeed Menelik�s victory.� Hence they equate Menelik with Adwa, as the latter is, in turn, equated with the people of local Tigrayan people in the first category.

The third category constitutes individuals and/or groups who are in self-denial vis-�-vis the victory of Adwa. In this third category, the individuals and/or groups strongly disagree with the idea that the victory of Adwa was an Ethiopian victory. On the contrary, they advocate that Italy was indeed the victor despite ample historical evidence that the Italians themselves accepted defeat and reluctantly swallowed humiliation in the face of world public opinion. The third category comprise non-Ethiopians who are either delusional or are nostalgic of colonial heritage that left an indelible scar on their mental faculty.

The fourth category has no problem accepting the Ethiopian victory at Adwa, but wittingly or unwittingly they misconstrue the post-Adwa events as if Menelik was not in a position to pursue the defeated Italians in disarray and who were in fact fleeing for their lives. This individuals argue that Menelik or the Ethiopian army were equipped with primitive weaponry compared to the sophisticated Italian technology.

The first two categories, for the most part, entertained somewhat na�ve ideas about history, and by virtue of their ignorance they have virtually estranged themselves from the realities pertaining to the victory of Adwa. Only education and exposure can emancipate them from their antediluvian caves they are in.

In the third and fourth categories ideas are fostered by intellectuals who may have deliberately committed omissions in historiography presently surrounding the battle of Adwa. I have challenged these fallacious historical anecdotes several times in many of my writings. With respect to Adwa as an Italian victory, and not an Ethiopian one, we suggest that readers have a look at Falsification of History Will not Conceal Ethiopia�s Victory at Adwa at www.ethiomedia.com /falsification_of_history.html. Moreover, we suggest our subscribers to read The Ethiopian Victory at Adwa: Meanings for Africans and People of African Descent in the Diaspora (www.africanidea.org/Ethiopian_victory.html) in order to better understand how mighty and formidable the Ethiopian forces were at Adwa. Contrary to popular belief and misconception that Ethiopians fought with spears and swords at Adwa, the fighting forces had numerous guns and cannons. Ethiopians could have not been victorious without guns. Had they relied only on their sheer number, courage, and outmoded weapons, Ethiopia would have been proclaimed an Italian colony in 1896 and the present generation of Ethiopians would have not been able to observe series of Adwa victory anniversaries.

On behalf of IDEA,

Ghelawdewos Araia

IDEA, Inc. Copyright � 2007