2005,
blessing or curse for African economy
China View
NAIROBI,
Dec. 19 (Xinhuanet) -- The year 2005 has been both
a blessing and a curse for the African economy.
The world's poorest continent no longer wanders at
a crossroad, but rather on a track for the good,
yet old specters refuse to go away and threaten
the continent's very hope of recovery. The best
news came in the middle of the year, when G8 group
of rich Nations announced sweeping debt relief and
aid initiatives to help the continent, second on
the list was historic polls held in turbulent
Liberia in the latter half of the year, ending
years of conflict and delivered a clean sheet of
electoral conduct. But all at the same time the
world watched almost indifferently, at least for
some time, hungry people in Niger and Malawi
scrape along by, sometimes, eating tree bark,
while Darfur and Somalia, after encouraging
developments last year, mired deeper into conflict
and insecurity.
HELP
AFRICA OR HELP IT TO HELP ITSELF
The G8 group of industrialized countries in
July agreed in Scotland to double aid to Africa,
which would mean 50 billion US dollars every year.
Along with an earlier announced initiative to
cancel 40 billion US dollars of multilateral debt
owed by 18 poor countries, the bulk of which in
Africa. More African countries' debts are also
scheduled to be canceled.
The continent was jubilant. Without the
burden of servicing huge foreign debt, Zambia is
able to employ more teachers; Tanzania is capable
of abolishing primary school fees; Uganda will
ensure more of its people get clean water... Not
to mention what is to come with the aid package.
"It was a good gesture," S. M. Nyandemo,
an economist with the University of Nairobi told
Xinhua in a recent interview. He said the debt
relief and aid initiative was one big step toward
the right direction in resuscitating African
economy, which would eventually do not only
Africa, but also the whole world much good.
"Whatever
they (African countries) have to pay for those
debts, and whatever they used to service those
debts, can now be directed back into their
economies, and invest" into where money is
most urgently needed, Nyandemo said.
But can debt relief and aid buy Africa the
much-needed recovery is subjected to doubt. No
successful poverty eradication effort in recent
history, be it China's turn to market or India's
nod to Entrepreneurship is brought to the hands of
nations by outside aid. In fact, there are worries
that "easy money" from the outside might
not bring a robust home market and energetic
private sector, although liberalized markets and
privatized industries are usually among strings
attached to aid money.
"The key question is how positively
these aid money can be used," Nyandemo said.
Events took place after the G8 meeting in July
demonstrated the urgency to build up certain
capacities in Africa, which aid money alone cannot
do. Top of the list is hunger in Niger, predicted
even before this year started, when locusts ate
away the already meager crops for harvest.
But the government's plea for assistance
exactly one year ago went largely unnoticed as the
world grappled to come to terms with the shock of
the Indian Ocean tsunami which killed two hundred
thousand. When food aid finally started to arrive
in August, situation in Niger already reached
crisis level. And its prospect of attracting
further aid was again overshadowed by Hurricane
Katrina sweeping across Louisiana. So was the case
with a similar hunger crisis in Malawi later this
year, which was eclipsed by the earthquake in
south Asia.
"In many cases the donor community
doesn't respond in time to Africa's
calamities," Nyandemo said, suggesting
African economies "team up to assist
themselves," and African institutions such as
the African Development Bank and the African Union
"play a key role" in alleviating African
disasters, "before the international donor
community comes in."
"Hunger crisis was created largely by poor
agriculture policies," Nyandemo said, noting
the lack of reform in agriculture sector and
nearly non-existent scientific research in the
sector in Africa did nothing to help enhance food
security.
Albeit there are problems aid alone cannot
solve, aid can bring reforms that put Africa back
on track. Jeffrey Sachs, a renowned economist in
charge of United Nations' Millennium Project,
reckoned the continent is simply too poor to grow.
Doomed by disease and smallness of the countries
and the majority of the populations' remoteness to
the coast, Africa can attract little capital to
support a feasible recovery. And its population
save only a fraction of their income compared to
what Asians do. Without huge amount of money
injected from the outside, the continent is
trapped in a vicious circle of poverty. The key
question is just how to use the money positively,
and not let it leak away along its course to reach
all levels of the society.
MATCHING WHAT AFRICA NEEDS AND WHAT THE
WORLD NEEDS
The African economy has seen some positive
signs and a few good examples to look up to in the
recent years. During the period between 1995 and
2003, the economy in the sub-Saharan African
region grew by an average of 3.5 percent every
year. The year 2004 was 4.5 percent. The World
Bank and the International Monetary Fund both
predicted it to top five percent this year. Quite
a few countries, such as Uganda, South Africa and
the oil producing West African lot, have performed
especially well along the way. But the United
Nations has already given a verdict on African
poverty, saying its population living in extreme
poverty has increased during the past decade, and
will continue to increase in the near future,
expected to be around 340 million in 2015, drawing
a bizarre picture where poverty increases while
the economy marches on.
The West African oil giant Nigeria's
coveted oil fields in the Southern Niger Delta
churn out some 2.5 million barrels of oil every
day, earning the country envied crude cash by the
billions every year. But this year, amid
sky-rocketing oil price, the traditionally
volatile golden field of Nigeria is getting more
turbulent, with facilities of oil giants such as Chevron
Texaco and Shell seized by local youth and
militias, interrupting production nearly every
month. The government responded to the lack of law
and order in the region by arresting some of the
most prominent militia leaders and more frequent
raids on those groups advocating for independence
of the Delta.
As evident in the Nigerian stand-off
between oil giants and poor locals in the Niger
Delta, who claimed the multinationals, have done
little to help them while creating hordes of
problems such as pollution, Foreign Direct
Investment (FDI), though viewed as the one panacea
to rid poverty and restore development, was
questioned if it really helps Africa. The United
Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD)
said in a recent report that foreign investment in
Africa, mainly in mining and oil sector, have
yielded little benefit for African countries'
economies, and created few jobs for the
continent's growing youth population.
According to the UN agency, annual FDI received by
Africa increased nine fold in the past 20 years to
18 billion US dollars, driven by a strong global
demand for fuel and minerals.
However, beneficiaries to this growth were a
minority in Africa. The UNCTAD said the investment
in oil sector, for example, remain locked in
"enclaves" and did little to help the
communities around them, hence the problem in
Nigeria.
"History has a habit of repeating
itself," the study said. "In the past,
foreign firms steered a development course for
Africa at odds with local needs."
In more explicit terms, UNCTAD
Secretary-General Supachai Panitchpakdi told
journalists that "the expectation for FDI to
create growth, to create diversification,
technology spillover and jobs has not really been
fully realized according to expectations."
Moreover, "the inflow of capital from
FDI may be a benefit but the resulting outflow of
profits may be so high as to make it a substantial
cost," the report said. For example, Ghana
and Tanzania had received as little as five
percent of the value of gold exports from a
foreign investment rush,according to the survey.
"The best investment in Africa are
those that trickles down and benefit the
poor," Nyandemo, the economist with the
University of Nairobi, told Xinhua, saying what
Africa needs most is investment in physical
infrastructure and human capital.
The agricultural sector is the most
important if the African economy is to take off,
Nyandemo said, calling it the "core
sector" that can create room and base for
other sectors to evolve and develop.
Nyandemo suggested African governments
forge "partnership" with foreign
investors where they always take 51 percent in the
joint venture, and invest the profit in
infrastructure and agriculture, in
whichmultinationals rarely show any interest.
However, the shape of things are not what
Nyandemo would like to see. In order to compete
with each other, many African countries even offer
incentives to such a degree that they have become
a sort of subsidy to foreign corporations,
according to the UN report.
OLD GHOSTS DIE HARD
The paradox of growth in both the African
economy and African poverty demonstrates the
challenges the continent is facing. Heavy burdens
of disease, corruption, conflicts and bad
governance and an unfair world trade system all
contribute to the painfully slow progress or even
reversal in the sharing of newly created wealth.
Some old ghosts die hard, and threaten to devour
the precious improvements.
Africa's disease burdens are like no other
continent has ever seen. Its people account for 85
percent of the world's 1.2 million malaria deaths
every year, and 75 percent of more than three
million annual AIDS deaths. Rare but painful, even
deadly, diseases such as river blindness, Guinea
Worm and sleeping sickness also testifies to the
health problems in Africa.
Sub-Saharan Africa is also home to some 25
million people living with HIV, a time bomb that
will one day impact hard and deep in the African
economy.
Efforts to reduce AIDS deaths have yielded
results in Africa, with the World Health
Organization's "Three by Five"
initiative, which began in 2003, helping to
transform HIV from a death sentence to a chronic
but manageable disease by putting more than a
million people in low- and middle-income countries
on expensive cocktail of drugs.
"Between 250,000 and 350,000 deaths
were averted in 2005," UNAIDS announced last
month. The "Three by Five" initiative
was "dramatically scaled up" in the past
year.
However,
as hopeful signs emerge, there are still about 3.2
million new infections in sub-Saharan Africa in
2005, far exceeding its 2.4 million deaths sin the
same period, and outstripping efforts to contain
it.
Except disease, conflicts and corruption
still haunt the continent. In Sudan's troubled
western region of Darfur and the Horn of Africa
nation Somalia, the chance of peace is again
eclipsed by tribal, political and ethnic feuds,
backtracking the much hyped progress made last
year, sending tremorsall across the African
continent as Darfur crisis enters into its third
year, and pirates hijack ships carrying food aid
in the high seas off Somalia's 3,000-km coastline.
The African continent has long been
considered the most corrupt, with evil-doing
politicians go unpunished and officials follow
their examples. Corruption watchdog Transparency
International said in October out of 44 African
nations covered in its 2005 Corruption Perceptions
Index (CPI), 31 scored less than three -- "a
sign of rampant corruption" -- on a scale of
zero to ten.
But that is not to say there's no positive
progress. West Africa has seen a few things unlike
what's likely to happen in the past. In Togo, the
West African bloc of ECOWAS forced Faure
Gnassingbe, son of longtime leader Gnassingbe
Eyadema, who passed away in February, to back off
from taking the helm without a popular vote, and
go through elections to be declared president.
Liberia, the one country that has seen more
bloodshed than any other nation in Africa has, and
destabilized its region for the past decade, held
internationally heralded general polls in October
and November, and began its journey towards peace
and prosperity. Burundi has also done the same,
while the Democratic Republic of the Congo held
its vote on a new constitution this month.
Governments
in Africa have their ups and downs, but with
democracy taking roots on the continent,
responsible governance is bound to be the trend,
and steer African countries towards development.
Yet the world market doesn't seem too friendly to
aspiring African nations. Rich nations continued
to provide huge subsidies to their farmers,
denying African produce a fair chance in their
markets. Farm export subsidies, which in the
European Union alone amounts to 55 billion euros
(about 66 billion US dollars) yearly, will not be
scrapped until 2013,
according
to a watered-down deal agreed on Sunday by World
Trade Organization members meeting in Hong Kong.
The deal also promised to provide "duty-free
and quota-free market access for at least 97
percent of product originating from LDCs (least
developed countries)" beginning by 2008 or
after an overall Doha Round framework agreement is
completed. The current Doha Round of development
trade talks began in 2001, and is due to end at
the end of next year.
But like it or not, 2005 has been a more
constructive year for Africa than a lot of its
predecessors we've seen in the recent history.
More than a decade of economic reforms have
created the right environment for business and
economic growth, with several countries' average
growth rates go beyond 6 percent. Ghana and
Mozambique have seen reforms driving economic
growth; income in oil-laden west Africa and
copper-rich Zambia were boosted by higher prices,
and continent powerhouse South Africa also
recorded strong growth.
"African
economies are indeed growing" and the G8 debt
relief and more aid will eventually bring more
progress, according to Dr.Nyandemo, citing
Tanzania and the west African region of ECOWAS,
whose oil income have been Invested to expand
economy and tackle debt, as the shining points in
the Africaneconomy this year.
|